Post by account_disabled on Mar 5, 2024 5:00:13 GMT -5
Foss did not ban the practice of paying ransoms after attacks, which is not yet formally provided for in law, although two other panelists pointed out that Italy has a unique law prohibiting the families of kidnapping victims from paying ransoms, but instead suggested that the long-term solution would be to let A greater cost to the perpetrator rather than a harsher punishment to the victim is more of a deterrent and prevention. Neither agree nor disagree it is in the interest of society that no one pays the ransom so pirates find it unprofitable to engage in such behavior. Yet every business must consider its own bottom line and paying a ransom may be the best approach.
There is a sad but understandable tension between social and private interests, University of California, Berkeley Consented panelists agreed or strongly agreed that companies should pay the ransom Spain Mobile Number List and pointed to reasons for moral hazard to overcome the immediate crisis and the growing importance of data as a competitive advantage. And other factors. As pointed out assuming this is consumer or any third party data companies owe a duty of care to their partners. Hackers pose a security risk just like any other risk and are ultimately the responsibility of the company.
Joshua Gans noted that others could be hacked if individual companies paid but also noted that this relates to a broader policy issue rather than a company's strategic goal of solving the problem and continuing to invest in prevention. Agree that if it solves the problem then it makes sense for them to overcome the immediate crisis and then invest heavily to prevent it from happening again. Of course this makes others more likely to be hacked but this is a broader policy issue.
There is a sad but understandable tension between social and private interests, University of California, Berkeley Consented panelists agreed or strongly agreed that companies should pay the ransom Spain Mobile Number List and pointed to reasons for moral hazard to overcome the immediate crisis and the growing importance of data as a competitive advantage. And other factors. As pointed out assuming this is consumer or any third party data companies owe a duty of care to their partners. Hackers pose a security risk just like any other risk and are ultimately the responsibility of the company.
Joshua Gans noted that others could be hacked if individual companies paid but also noted that this relates to a broader policy issue rather than a company's strategic goal of solving the problem and continuing to invest in prevention. Agree that if it solves the problem then it makes sense for them to overcome the immediate crisis and then invest heavily to prevent it from happening again. Of course this makes others more likely to be hacked but this is a broader policy issue.